We follow the argument of `5.103`. We find that the contribution of the first Fresnel zone is
`A_(1)=-(4pi i)/(k)a_(0)e^(-ikb)`
For the next half zone it is `-(A_(2))/(2)(1 + i)`
(The contribution of the remaining part of the `2^(nd)` Fresnel zone will be `-(A_(2))/(2)(1 - i))`
If the disc has a thickness `h`, the extra phase difference suffered by the light wave in passing through the disc will be
`delta = (2pi)/(lambda) (n - 1)h`.
THus the amplitude at `P` will be
`E_(P) = (A_(1)-(A_(2))/(2)(1+i))e^(-i delta) -(A_(2))/(2)(1 - i) + A_(3) - A_(4) - A_(5)+...........`
`~~((A_(1)(1 -i))/(2))e^(-i delta) + (iA_(1))/(2) = (A_(1))/(2)[(1 - i)e^(-i delta) + i]`
The corresponding intensity will be
`I = I_(0) (3-2 cos delta - 2 sin delta) = I_(0) (3-2 sqrt(2) sin(delta + (pi)/(4)))`
The intensity will be a maximum when
`sin(delta + (pi)/(4)) =-1`
or `delta + (pi)/(4) = 2kpi + (3pi)/(2)`
i.e., `delta = (k + (5)/(8)).2pi`
so `h = (lambda)/(n - 1) (k + (5)/(8)), k = 0, 1, 2,.........`
Note:- It is not clear why `k = 2` for `h_(min)`. The normal choice will be `k = 0`. If we take `k = 0`, we get `h_(min) = 0.59mum`.