The difference between instance store-backed and EBS-backed Amazon Machine Images (AMIs) lies primarily in how the root volume (where the operating system is installed) of the EC2 instance is managed and persisted. Here’s a breakdown of each type:
Instance Store-backed AMIs:
-
Storage Location:
- Instance Store Volumes: Instance store-backed AMIs use disks that are physically attached to the host computer that is running the instance. These disks are typically ephemeral, meaning they are temporary and exist only for the lifetime of the instance.
-
Characteristics:
- Performance: Instance store volumes often provide higher I/O performance compared to EBS volumes because they are directly attached to the host.
- Non-persistent: Data stored on instance store volumes is not persistent across instance stops, terminations, or failures. It is lost when the instance is stopped or terminated.
-
Use Cases:
- Stateless Applications: They are suitable for applications that do not require data persistence between instance launches, such as stateless web servers or transient batch processing workloads.
- High I/O Performance: Applications that benefit from local storage with high IOPS requirements, such as databases or caching servers.
-
Backup and Recovery:
- Instance store-backed instances do not support creating snapshots for backup purposes. Backup and recovery mechanisms need to be managed separately, often through application-level or external backup solutions.
EBS-backed AMIs:
-
Storage Location:
- Elastic Block Store (EBS): EBS-backed AMIs use EBS volumes as their root device. EBS volumes are network-attached storage devices that persist independently from the instance lifecycle.
-
Characteristics:
- Persistence: Data stored on EBS volumes persists even after the instance is stopped or terminated. This allows for data durability and the ability to detach and reattach volumes to different instances.
- Snapshots: EBS volumes support creating point-in-time snapshots, which can be used for backup, disaster recovery, and cloning purposes.
-
Use Cases:
- Databases and Persistent Storage: EBS-backed AMIs are suitable for applications that require persistent data storage, such as databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL) or file servers.
- Frequent Updates and Backups: Applications that require frequent updates or backups benefit from the snapshot capabilities of EBS volumes.
-
Performance:
- Performance: EBS volumes provide consistent and predictable performance characteristics based on the selected volume type (e.g., General Purpose SSD, Provisioned IOPS SSD, Magnetic).
- Latency: EBS-backed instances typically have slightly higher network latency compared to instance store-backed instances due to the network-attached nature of EBS volumes.
Choosing Between Instance Store-backed and EBS-backed AMIs:
-
Performance vs. Persistence: Choose instance store-backed AMIs for applications that require high I/O performance and can tolerate data loss between instance lifecycle events. Opt for EBS-backed AMIs for applications that require data persistence, durability, and frequent backups.
-
Data Management: Instance store-backed instances require careful management of data and state, whereas EBS-backed instances simplify data persistence and backup through EBS snapshots.
-
Cost Considerations: Instance store-backed instances may have lower operational costs since they do not incur EBS volume charges, but require additional effort for data management and backup.
Understanding these differences helps in selecting the appropriate AMI type based on your application’s requirements for performance, data persistence, and operational management in AWS EC2 environments.
