NCERT Solutions Class 12, Economics, Indian Economic Development, Chapter- 1, Indian Economy on the Eve of Independence
1. What was the focus of the economic policies pursued by the colonial government in India? What were the impacts of these policies?
Solution:
The main aim of the economic policies adopted by the colonial government was to make India just a supplier to Britain’s flourishing industries. The policies were made to benefit and strengthen their own country. They completely ignored the interests of the Indian economy. These discriminatory policies made the Indian economy a supplier to British economy and consumer of finished goods of British economy. The effects of these policies are given below:
1) Low Economic Development
During British rule, there was a very little economic development. This was because the British government was more focused on the promotion of their own economic interest. Consequently, the colonial rule converted India's agriculture sector into a supplier of raw materials for the British industrial base. This affected the production of the agricultural sector of India. It also destroyed the small manufacturing industries such as handicrafts and cotton industries. These manufacturing units suffered a cut throat competition from the British machine made textiles and handlooms.
2) Backwardness of Indian Agriculture
India was basically an agricultural economy employing almost of its population in the colonial rule. There was a meagre growth in agriculture sector. It was caused by the presence of various land settlement systems, particularly the Zamindari system. In this system, the zamindars (landowners) had to pay very high revenue (lagaan) to the British government, which they collected from the peasants (landless labourers). The zamindars were focused on extracting high revenues from the peasants but never took any interest in the improvement of the productivity of the land using cheap raw materials. As a result, Indian peasants grew cash crops (e.g., indigo and cotton) in order to feed British industries at the expense of food crops instead of food crops (such as, rice and wheat). This commercialisation of agriculture increased the burden of high revenues on the poor peasants. It also led Indians face shortage of food grains. Hence, Indian agriculture remained backward and primitive.
3) De-industrialisation of Indian Economy
India, during colonial era, was not able to develop a sound and strong industries. The term 'systematic de-industrialisation' can be used to define the status of industrial sector during the colonial rule. The downfall of India's handicraft industry led to deindustrialisation and the cause of meager growth of modern industry was the lack of investment. Indian handicraft products were taxed heavily by the British government, which permitted free exports to Britain of raw materials and free imports of British products from India. Because of these, the Indian exports became dearer and its demand in the international market fell miserably that led to the decline of Indian handicrafts industries. Simultaneously, the demand for the Indian products fell in the domestic markets as machine made textiles were cheaper than Indian handicrafts. Hence, the domestic industries lacked investment and growth initiatives.
4) Regression in Foreign Trade
In the colonial era, the British government had the monopoly over India's foreign trade. According to the British government, the trade policies were based on the government's interests. Until the end of the 19th century, exports and imports were restricted to India and Britain. India's exports provided cheap raw materials for the British industries, and Britain's imports from India provided a untouched market for British goods. In every way, British industries were benefitted. The surplus money generated from the foreign trade was not even invested in the Indian economy. It was used for administrative and war activities by Britain.
2. Name some notable economists who estimated India’s per capita income during the colonial period.
Solution:
The following economists estimated India’s per capita income during the colonial period:
- Dadabhai Naoroji
- R.C Desai
- V.K.R.V. Rao
- William Digby
- Findlay Shirras
3. What were the main causes of India’s agricultural stagnation during the colonial period?
Solution:
Indian economy during the colonial era remained basically agrarian. About 85 percent of the population who were living mostly in villages derived their livelihood directly or indirectly from agriculture. A very low growth rate was recorded in the agriculture sector. The reasons that explain why there was stagnancy in Indian agriculture sector during the colonial rule are:
1) Introduction of Land Revenue System
India was basically an agricultural economy employing almost of its population in the colonial rule. There was a meagre growth in agriculture sector. This was due to the presence of various systems of Land Settlement, particularly Zamindari system. The zamindars (owners of land) needed to pay very high revenue (lagaan) to the British government, which they collected from the peasants (landless labourers). The zamindars focused on receiving high revenues from the poor landless labourers but never took any interest in the improvement of the productivity of the land with cheap raw materials. This resulted in low agricultural productivity and also degraded the peasants economically.
2) Forceful Commercialisation
Before the colonial era, the farmers used to practise conventional subsistence method of farming. They used to grow food crops like rice and wheat for own consumption. Then, in order to provide British industries with cheap raw materials, the Indian farmers were forced to grow commercial crops (like indigo required by British industries to dye textiles) instead of food crops .The result was the commercialization of Indian agriculture. As a result of this commercialization of Indian agriculture, the poor farmers were not only burdened by high investment costs, but they also faced a shortage of food grains, resources, and technology. Therefore, Indian agriculture remained backward and primitive.
3) Facilities and resources were lacking for irrigation
The Indian agricultural market also encountered shortages of irrigation facilities, inadequate fertilizer use, little investment, and occasional famines and natural disasters, etc. that further exaggerated the agricultural performance and made it more vulnerable.
4. Name some modern industries which were in operation in our country at the time of independence.
Solution:
India witnessed the growth of some industries before independence, the most prominent of which is Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO). India was also witnessing a growth of textile mills and ancillary products. Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Bengal were areas where cotton and jute industries were set up. Apart from these industries, some other industries that started operating are sugar, paper and cement.
5. What was the two-fold motive behind the systematic de-industrialisation affected by the British in pre-independent India?
Solution:
The two-fold motives behind de-industrialisation by the British were as follows:
1. Obtaining raw materials from India at rock-bottom prices and reducing the status of India as a supplier of raw materials for feeding its industries back in Britain.
2. Selling the finished goods in India and thereby making India a market for selling items produced by British industries.
6. The traditional handicrafts industries were ruined under British rule. Do you agree with this view? Give reasons in support of your answer.
Solution:
Yes, the traditional handicraft industry was ruined under British rule. The following points are in agreement with this statement:
1. The British had introduced a discriminatory tariff policy. This led to a high export tariff on Indian-made goods, which made the price of products high in international markets, leading to less demand for Indian-made goods. Consequently, this ended up ruining the handicraft industry.
2. As Britain began importing duty-free goods from Britain to India, the demand for locally made goods started decreasing as the mechanically produced goods were much cheaper. This resulted in ruining the market for handicrafts.
3. The princely states of India used to provide patronage to local art and handicraft, but during British rule, the princely states were ruined by the East India Company, which thus resulted in a decrease in demand for Indian-made goods. Indian handicrafts gradually lost their market and diminished.